Transparency in Politics: A Closer Look at MPs’ Declarations
As Members of Parliament (MPs) across the country submit their annual declarations of personal and financial interests, there is growing concern among analysts that these disclosures may not fully reflect the true financial landscape of South Africa’s political elite. While the documents appear comprehensive, critics argue they might be a polished version of a more complex reality.
The latest report, released by the Joint Committee on Ethics and Members’ Interests, highlights a wide array of gifts, properties, shares, and other benefits received by lawmakers in 2025. All 400 MPs submitted their disclosures within the stipulated deadline for the first time, indicating improved compliance with reporting requirements.
The register details a diverse range of interests, including cellphones, liquor, sheep, food parcels, books, tickets to sporting and music events, and paid air travel and accommodations. These items offer a glimpse into the varied lifestyles of South Africa’s political leaders.
Notably, prominent figures such as Deputy President Paul Mashatile and Deputy Minister Alvin Botes declared multiple properties, shares in financial institutions, and rental income, showcasing their substantial asset portfolios. However, political analyst Joe Mhlanga warns that these declarations may not tell the whole story.
“If the declarations were a true reflection of the lives led by politicians, then this country would be thriving,” Mhlanga stated. “What we are seeing might be a deliberate effort by some of these politicians to mask the extent of their assets and dealings. Many have foundations or entities that facilitate campaign funding or other activities, and these often operate behind the scenes to prevent scrutiny.”
Mhlanga added that politicians go to great lengths to ensure that their assets or dealings are not registered under their names or are kept out of the public eye. This makes it easier for them to avoid questions about the origins of their wealth or potential conflicts of interest. The declared gifts and interests, he said, are just the tip of the iceberg.
Despite these concerns, Mhlanga emphasized the need for stronger oversight mechanisms within Parliament. “There is a pressing need for stronger checks and balances to ensure accountability,” he urged. “Without robust oversight, these declarations risk becoming mere formalities rather than tools for transparency.”
The report also highlights a growing trend of MPs tapping into other income streams. Several lawmakers declared ownership of multiple properties and shares in various financial companies. For instance, Botes owns five properties and has shares valued at approximately R2.8 million with Poliyane Property Trust, in addition to rental income from his properties. Similarly, Mashatile owns three multimillion-rand properties in affluent suburbs like Constantia and Midrand.
The disclosures also revealed some less conventional gifts. Julius Malema, leader of the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), received a sheep valued at R7,000, Lindt chocolates, and a bottle of wine as gifts. The report also noted instances of sponsored travel, such as several ActionSA MPs who declared trips to Taiwan funded by the local trade office, amid calls to downgrade Taiwan’s diplomatic status in Pretoria.
Historian Khaya Ndwandwe commented that politicians have learned the game of not attracting attention. “While the declarations provide a snapshot of MPs’ interests, our people have a different argument that without stronger enforcement and transparency measures, the declarations risk serving as a façade rather than a true account of political financial dealings.”
Ndwandwe felt that although transparency is vital, it must be genuine. “Otherwise, these declarations are just window dressing – a polished version of a reality that may be far more troubling. And we know this because every day in the news, we read about much-needed resources politicians steal.”
